Below are reviews for two films that I couldn't quite flesh out a whole review on but thought I'd put them together for anyone who was interested in reading them.
Pitch Perfect 2
Pitch Perfect 2 is exactly the right blend of pop and fizz that you'd want it to be. It moves fast perfectly paced with musical numbers picking things up when it slows down. The jokes keep coming thick and fast. The characters are all entertaining and likeable so you never feel bored. I don't remember much about the first Pitch Perfect but I remember it having a bit more heart. When you come out of Pitch Perfect 2 you feel like you've been intoxicated and drugged by a load of perfectly calibrated E-Numbers and whilst there's nothing wrong with that in the cinema because it's so damn watchable afterwards it all feels a bit flat.
The Last Five Years
The Last Five Years in an good yet flawed adaption of what seems like a strong musical the songs are absolutely terrific and the narrative technique is interesting yet ultimately the film feels very light and a bit lacking. Anna Kendrick is great and Jeremy Jordan is good but you never get over the sense that your watching a very quick run through of the songs it never pauses in order to allow us into the drama of the piece. In fact the trailer seems to sell the tension in the piece better than the film does. This isn't to say the film isn't watchable it's very enjoyable and a perfectly decent way to spend and hour and a half but afterwards you feel like maybe it would have stuck with you more if it had paced itself better and sold its big moments more.
What’s the vision we’d like to hold for the
future? That’s a key question Tomorrowland asks. It explicitly puts forward the
idea that if we think of the future as a dystopian wasteland then that is a
self fore filling prophecy. Tomorrowlandlongs for a past vision of the future a vision of clean white and glass
buildings and people in strange colourful outfits, the films wants us to look
to the future with a wide eyed sense of optimism.
Tomorrowland opens very strong. We meet
Casey (Britt Robertson). It’s clear that Casey see’s the world differently to
everyone else she asks how we can stop the impending doom people talk about.
Casey is frustrated about the space program being shut down so she tries to do
something about it. After she get’s arrested she is started on her path to Tomorrowland.
This first act is really good fun. The film roars along at an entertaining
pace. It set’s up these interesting ideas about the future whilst being filled
with nostalgia. There’s mystery in the form of the mysterious girl Athena and
the films very engaging. The problem is the film sets up lots of thing up which
we would usually expect to be resolved later on but the whole thing struggles
to move forward it drags along and the majority of the film feels like a first
act it then races towards a conclusion which feels like an oddly apt metaphor
for the film. The characters reach Tomorrowland which all along has been set up
to be some utopian wonder yet it looks more like an empty shopping center much
like how the film has been asking question yet it never really answers them. In
the end the conclusion is about 10 minutes of speeches with a tiny bit of cgi
action. This isn’t to say it’s a bad time at the pictures because it’s an
engaging piece of entertainment. The cast are great. Britt Robertson is
terrific as Casey she’s highly likeable and captures the sense of enthusiasm
the character needs. George Clooney plays Frank the embittered former child
genius and Clooney is great in the role but you don’t get the feeling to role
especially fits him it doesn’t utilize the sort of charm you might expect from
Clooney. Brad Birds direction is solid as well its never the quality of The
Incredibles and Ratatouille but he keeps the film moving along and manages to
capture an interesting sense of time and place.
Tomorrowland is ultimately a highly
enjoyable innocent action film but outside of the cinema it leaves you more
confused than interested but it’s worth seeing and it’s intentions are in the
right place.
A lot has changed in the world around comic
book superhero movies since the first avengers film hit in 2012. Now shared
universes are the box office gold every studio wants to mine. The Marvel
Cinematic Universe itself is expanding at an exponential rate with numerous tv
shows and soon the number of films a year will jump from 2 to 3 with Spiderman
expected to appear on screen next year as well. So its natural to wonder after
a time away how would the group dynamic of changed in the film? Well the simple
answer is no and yes. The magic of the first film is still here though the
characters are stronger and more fractured because it’s the stakes are
higher.
The Avengers burst back onto the big screen
with a bang wrapped up in an A* tracking shot. The camera spins and looms
jumping up and weaving in and out of each member of the team as they dispatch a
load of hydra goons in a forest. It’s an incredible sequence in the way it
balances the individual little comedic character beats with the large scale
action reminding us of the fact Marvel’s best with its characters.
In fact it’s no coincidence thatMarvel have so far only deployed their secret
weapon Joss Whedon (Famous for his ensemble character sci fi shows like Firefly
and Buffy The Vampire Slayer) for their avengers films which are obviously
focused on the large ensemble cast. If you read interviews with Whedon he came
back to the franchise because he felt he still had places to go with this cast
and that’s what makes the film great the action sequences are captivating the
storyline line gripping but what sells this film is the characters. Often it’s
easy to say with the solo films like Iron Man 3 and Captain America to ask if
everything is so bad why don’t the others turn up and help out and this film shows
why. Ultron is a threat strong enough to call them together. He tears them
apart from the inside. One thread throughout the film is the question of what
the avengers stand for and that isn’t decided by the end but it’s clear Ultron
definitely isn’t it/ Ultron is more than some standard bad robot. He’s created
by Tony Stark in the hope of creating a force of global protection but he
rebels like a bad teenager. James Spader’s motion capture performance as Ultron
is one of the best motion capture performances I’ve seen the way the film
utilizes his voice and body to create this genuinely captivating character is
impeccable.
In terms of the Avengers themselves there’s
a change in where the focus fall on the members of the group . Captain America
and Thor don’t have much to do because they’ve had their own solo films. But
Hawkeye who was basically an extra in the last film is a main character in this
one. So much so I’d proudly say he’s one of my favourite avengers now Renner’s
shows a new comedic side to Hawkeye that I look forward to seeing more of in
future films. Possibly the most emotional arc though is that of the
relationship between Hulk and Black Widow it goes beyond the charm of the two
to become a very deep relationship impeded by their own personal pasts. There
are new avengers as well Quicksilver (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) opens up new angles
for the action with the use of slo mo (The quicksilver stuff here is so much
stronger than the stuff in Days of Future Past). Quicksilver opens up the team
and brings a youthful vibe. Scarlet Witch (Elizabeth Olsen) is another star in
the cast. Scarlet Witch’s powers cause some initial problems for the avengers
at the start but soon she proves herself in one of the most uplifting moments
of the film. Yet the new member stealing the show is the vision (Paul Bettany)
honestly it’s hard to describe how great the vision is on screen. He’s just so
wonderfully weird looking and he seems like such a young character, it will be
exciting to see him learn and grow on screen.
Avengers Age of Ultron is an entirely
captivating film that proves that blockbusters can be just as smart and
emotionally moving as normal dramas. This is the film that we’ve been waiting
three years for and its worth the wait.
I’m undeniably team Marvel. I think the way
they have redefined mainstream cinema storytelling over the last few years is
amazing. I think they’ve proved that blockbusters can be smart character driven
and entertaining. Since Thor in 2011 (A low point for the studio) they haven’t
put a foot out of line in terms of the films they’ve released (We are yet to
see what the result of the Edgar Wright Ant Man debacle will be) but Daredevil
is a real failure.
Everything that’s wrong with Daredevil comes
down to the tone that has been decided for the series. What Marvel often get right
is the way they keep the tone upbeat but they still leave room for interesting
character stuff and a sense of tension. Daredevil seems like an exercise in
melodramatic seriousness it’s as if the series has been written by a 14 year
old boy who likes “Graphic Novels”. Every scene seems legally required to take
place in a dark alley way at the middle of the night. This might be acceptable
if the show had any sense of irony but it doesn’t. The show also doesn’t hold
back on the violence often inflicted by our protagonist. I can understand moral
ambiguity in order to create conflict but Daredevil justseems like an pain. The show is awfully paced
every scene seems really slow and in-between the scenes there are long even
more boring flashbacks to Daredevils childhood.
One of the stranger elements of Daredevil
is the cast. Charlie Cox play Matt Murdock (Dardevil) and he makes a good
Murdock, when he’s Murdock he’s an enjoyable screen presence. Deborah Ann Woll
plays Karen Page and she probably does the best out of the whole cast because
she manages to make the most of a real dud of a part. Karen is young woman who
is being helped by Murdock and his friend Foggy (Elden Henson) she is haunt by
grief. It’s a damsel in distress role we have seen time and time again. Henson
as Foggy is another strange element of the show he is by far the weakest of the
main three performers but he is undeniably the most entertaining as the comic
relief in a very dour show. When these three performers are in normal
conversational scenes together the show is at it’s most watchable but when
anything else is onscreen it’s generally terrible (with the exclusion of some
very well directed fight sequences that would be better if someone had told the
director and cinematographer what light looked like)
Daredevil is more bad than good. I haven’t watched the whole series yet and if it
gets better I’ll redact this but for the meantime I’d suggest for the
inevitable second series that the show should try and find it’s more comic
booky camp side.
(The whole of Daredevil series 1 is on Netflix now)
The set up to John Wick might sound a
little strange. It follows eponymous retired hit man (Keanu Reeves) coming out
of retirement to enact revenge after some Russian gangsters kill the dog given
to him by his dead wife. Let me assure you though the movie is so ridiculously
entertaining, the story is well told the action so stylized and violent John
Wick is one hell of a thrill ride.
When the film starts Johnis living in his cold and clinical modern
house we get the sense that everything around him is too safe, the white walls
of the house could be livened up with a bit of blood soon though he’s called
out of his retirement. I said the set up sounds labouredbut the film sells it firstly we get a sense
of quite how much the dog means to him and secondly the scene where his dog
gets taken from him is done so well that you want John to get revenge on these
people.And boy does he get revenge. The
film is a tour de force of immaculate action set pieces. The film is directed
by David Leitch and Chad Stahelski they’re former stunt men so that’s where the
film finds its strength, the hand to hand combat scenes feel more like dance. Yet their work on the film extends beyond
these action scene they manage to perfectly balance the pacing of the film it’s
fast moving but when it allows itself to get some air it’s still good to watch
because the film is full of little moments of comedy and ideas about this world
which breathe some life into the film for instance there’s a hotel exclusively
for hit-men which has a very particular set of rules and a helpful yet
sarcastic receptionist.
John Wick is a young persons film about an
older man getting back to his past so its especially good that Keanu Reeves who
is fifty years old leads the film with the skill he does. He really makes the
role of Wick his own making him the relentless badass that it could be said
that action cinema has been lacking there’s also a sadness to John Wick though
and among all of the action we get a sense of how he is struggling to cope with
the loss of his wife. John Wick is a ruthless out of control film that never
gives in and never apologizes it feels like an action film for out time and it’s
sure to go down in cult history.
Fast and Furious 7 is almost exactly what
you might expect it to be yet I feel describing it like that is doing the film
a disservice. It is in fact a relentless ride of impeccable action and
fantastically over the top sequences that is held up by a cast who bounce off
of each other.
Something that has been key to the most
recent films in the series has been the action set pieces. Five culminates in
the crew driving a large safe around the streets of Rio, Six ends with an incredible
take down of a military plane on what might be the world longest run way. Well
let me tell you seven tops both of those sequences the first sequence is teased
in the trailer. The crew parachute their cars out of a plane to land on a piece
of road on a mountain to take down a crew of terrorists who have taken a hacker
hostage. This sequence is genuinely great it roars alongand ticks all the boxes in terms of the
entertainment that you might want from this series. James Wan handles this
sequences with absolute precision whilst the sequences moves quickly you
constantly understand what is going on. This is James Wan’s first film in the
franchise and I have to admit I found it quite hard to see what made his
direction different from that of Justin Lin in the previous entries but he
handles the film very well and perfectly fits the style of the films. Whilst
the mountain sequence in the film is the best in terms of storytelling I think
my favouritesegment of the film has to
be the part in Abu Dhabai just for the sheer ridiculousness of the whole thing.
What also makes these films is the crew
themselves and whilst the crew is a bit smaller in this film (Dwayne “The Rock”
Johnson sit most of the film out, Han and Gisele are gone, Mia is also missing
for most of the film) the repartee between the cast is still on top form. Tej
and Roman still have their comic bickering. In fact I have to say Tyrese Gibson
stole the show for me and it was definitely Roman drawing the most laughs out
of the audience I was with. Dom (Vin Diesel) still goes on about family every
fifth line. Whilst he isn’t in the film much when The Rock shows up he more
than steals the show; “I am the cavalry” is a line sure to go down in pop
culture history. It’s the fast we know but it’s also the fast we love. There is
one element that overhangs the films though and that is the tragic death of Paul
Walker. Walker died November 2013 about six months before the film was suppose
to come out this left half of his scenes unfilmed. The filmmakers got past this
by using a variety of stand-ins and creating a CGI Paul Walker. I have to say
never for a moment did I notice what they were doing and technically it was
entirely convincing. Yet most importantly they got the emotions just right. I
won’t spoil what happens but rest assured Brian isn’t killed off for shock
value but ultimately the film celebrates Walker and mourns his loss ultimately
underpinning the family message of the franchise.
Fast and Furious 7 more than delivers in
terms of entertainment between the large elaborate action pieces and the small
character moments but it also perfectly manages to handle the loss that damaged
the crew on and off screen.